![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CRAMP Sediment AnalysesComplex, dynamic processes are involved in the relationship sediment have with coral reefs. Sediment deposits may be influenced by bathymetry, wave regimes, and local currents that affect sediment deposition rates and size fractions. Sediment composition and grain size analyses can provide a characterization of the benthos, supplying information about benthic structure. Determination of sediment composition reflects type and abundance of coral coverage, and substrate. The type of sediment can identify groups of organisms primarily responsible for sediment accumulation. When combined with other means of investigation, sediment analysis can lead to identifying the forcing functions within that habitat. Sediments also relate to other environmental variables providing a quantitative link to biological parameters such as fish and algal populations. Some physical characteristics of sites can also be defined through sediment analyses including wave exposure and topographical relief. An example would be regions with a high percentage of silt and clay being indicative of relatively low water motion. Sediments were collected from two depths from each of 29 sites on six of the Main Hawaiian Islands: Hawai’i, Maui, Kaho’olawe, Moloka’i, O’ahu, and Kaua’i. No sediment was found along the 100m transect at the 10m site at Kamalō, Moloka’i. No sediment was collected from the CRAMP site at Hanalei, Kaua’i. Depths ranged from 2m to 13m with the exception of Hokulia, Hawai’i where a permanent site was installed at 23m subsequent to sediment loading from coastal construction in 1999. Grain size and sediment composition were determined for each sample collected. Approximately 500cc of sediment were collected along the transect at each site and secured in Fisher brand 9 x 18 cm sample bags. Replicate samples were collected at each depth. Sediment grain-size and composition were determined using standard geological methods (Parker, 1983, McManus, 1988, Craft et al., 1991). Standard brass sieves were used to determine size fraction: 2.8 mm, 500 um, 250 um, 125 um, and 63 um (USA Standard Testing Sieve: A.S.T.M.E.-11 specifications). A brass catch pan was used to collect the silt/clay fraction. Four size fractions were determined: gravel, coarse, fines, and silt in accordance with the Wentworth scale (Folk 1974). To determine the inorganic-organic carbon fraction, 10 grams of sediment were finely ground using a mortar and pestle. Samples were then dried for 10 hrs @ 100oC, placed in a desiccator and weighed. To remove the organic fraction, samples were burned in a muffle furnace for 12 hrs. @ 500oC, placed in a desiccator and weighed. For removal of carbonate material, samples were placed in a muffle furnace for 2 hrs. @ 1000oC, cooled in a desiccator and weighed. The percent loss on ignition was calculated from this data. Sediment CompositionLoss on Ignition (LOI)Sediment from all three sites at both depths in Kāne’ohe Bay and at Hakioawa, Kaho’olawe contain a high percentage of organic material. These outliers have between 7% and 17% organic matter, exhibiting the highest values in the state. All other sites range from a low of 0.18% at the 3m depth at Ka’apuna, Hawai’i to a high of 5.12% at the 3m depth at Laupāhoehoe, Hawai’i (Table 1).
H2CO3Sediments at 19 depths contain over 90% calcium carbonate. These sites are found on all of the islands sediments were collected from. High H2CO3 is consistent with high coral cover. Ka’apuna, Hawai’i is anomalous due to extremely low amounts of H2CO3 at both depths (0.18% & 0.31%). This relatively recent 1950’s lava flow is low in coral cover (7.7%) ranking 50th among the 60 reefs surveyed. The sediments from this site contain low levels of organic material and H2CO3 and extremely high levels of terrigenously based basalt (Table 1).
Terrigenously based materialsFive sites have greater than 50% materials other than organics and H2CO3. These are comprised mainly of basalt. Not surprisingly, Ka’apuna, Hawai’i the most recent lava flow of the selected sites has the highest percentage in the state: 3m (99.68%) and 10m (98.59%). Other sites with high percentages of basalt include Hakioawa, Kaho’olawe 3m (71.44%) and 10m (61.03%), and Laupāhoehoe, Hawai’i 10m (83.85%). While sites on Hawai’i the youngest island have a sediment composition high in basalt, sites on Kaua’i, the oldest of the main Hawaiian islands have very low levels. Table 1: Sediment Composition
Statistical AnalysesA scatterplot of sediment composition groups the sites having similar organic composition together in ordination space (Figure 1). These include Hakioawa, Kaho’olawe and all Kāne’ohe Bay sites. The extreme outlier, Ka’apuna, Hawai’i is low in both organics and calcium carbonate, consisting mainly of basalt. Most of the other sites group together, consisting of high H2CO3 and between 2% and 4% organic material. Another cluster of sites have lower H2CO3 than the main grouping and exhibit diverse exposure, depth, and latitudinal gradients.
Figure 1 Sediment Composition
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Gravel (>2.8mm) |
Coarse (>500um) |
Fine (>63um) |
Silt (<63um) |
||||
|
Station |
Mean |
St. Dev |
Mean |
St. Dev. |
Mean |
St. Dev. |
Mean |
St. Dev |
|
Hawai‘i |
||||||||
|
Ka‘apuna 4m |
95.9 |
4.09 |
3.09 |
2.97 |
0.80 |
0.99 |
0.21 |
0.13 |
|
Ka‘apuna 10m |
66.64 |
4.60 |
27.22 |
4.47 |
5.81 |
0.19 |
0.33 |
0.06 |
|
Hokulia 23m |
87.8 |
1.33 |
9.89 |
1.20 |
1.90 |
0.05 |
0.42 |
0.08 |
|
Nenue 5m |
63.46 |
21.69 |
30.52 |
18.16 |
5.88 |
3.67 |
0.29 |
0.06 |
|
Nenue 10m |
76.48 |
23.14 |
19.48 |
18.32 |
3.49 |
4.35 |
0.54 |
0.47 |
|
La‘aloa 3m |
79.2 |
4.23 |
14.61 |
2.27 |
4.65 |
2.16 |
1.54 |
0.20 |
|
La‘aloa 10m |
72.27 |
4.39 |
18.66 |
1.01 |
8.3 |
2.96 |
0.77 |
1.76 |
|
Kawaihae 3m |
85.39 |
2.20 |
5.91 |
2.36 |
8.04 |
3.99 |
0.66 |
0.57 |
|
Kawaihae 10m |
12.4 |
10.82 |
29.16 |
0.89 |
55.82 |
13.71 |
2.62 |
2.01 |
|
Laupāhoehoe 3m |
66.31 |
16.38 |
17.19 |
9.07 |
13.32 |
6.83 |
3.19 |
0.48 |
|
Leleiwi 3m |
85.43 |
1.28 |
10.86 |
1.04 |
3.16 |
0.25 |
0.55 |
0.01 |
|
Leleiwi 10m |
68.99 |
39.76 |
23.44 |
30.48 |
7.13 |
9.03 |
0.44 |
0.24 |
|
Maui |
||||||||
|
Kanahena Bay 1m |
14.31 |
4.48 |
70.81 |
0.85 |
12.95 |
5.04 |
1.93 |
0.28 |
|
Kanahena Bay 3m |
82.54 |
17.8 |
14.85 |
18.09 |
1.65 |
0.06 |
0.96 |
0.23 |
|
Kanahena Point 3m |
82.81 |
11.34 |
11.91 |
7.03 |
4.05 |
3.64 |
1.23 |
0.67 |
|
Kanahena Point 10m |
56.04 |
22.16 |
20.38 |
6.81 |
20.37 |
13.92 |
3.21 |
1.42 |
|
Mā‘alaea 3m |
78.25 |
1.16 |
13.31 |
1.90 |
7.71 |
0.82 |
0.73 |
0.08 |
|
Mā‘alaea 6m |
88.04 |
8.67 |
7.22 |
5.87 |
3.78 |
2.55 |
0.96 |
0.24 |
|
Olowalu 3m |
11.71 |
8.4 |
29.09 |
13.36 |
58.79 |
21.77 |
0.41 |
0.01 |
|
Olowalu 7m |
0.62 |
0.05 |
11.35 |
0.95 |
87.17 |
1.00 |
0.86 |
0.00 |
|
Puamana 3m |
4.52 |
6.30 |
17.61 |
23.24 |
77.27 |
29.83 |
0.61 |
0.29 |
|
Puamana 13m |
33.58 |
12.83 |
18.14 |
0.84 |
44.36 |
12.06 |
3.92 |
1.61 |
|
Papa‘ula Point 4m |
79.27 |
21.83 |
19.74 |
21.55 |
0.74 |
0.29 |
0.25 |
0.02 |
|
Papa‘ula Point 10m |
73.72 |
9.46 |
22.33 |
6.99 |
3.51 |
2.45 |
0.44 |
0.02 |
|
Honolua North 3m |
44.9 |
11.35 |
33.35 |
2.06 |
20.34 |
13.57 |
1.42 |
0.17 |
|
Honolua South 3m |
42.64 |
3.2 |
42.32 |
3.92 |
12.8 |
0.31 |
2.24 |
1.04 |
|
Kahekili 3m |
38.55 |
8.84 |
50.41 |
4.09 |
10.47 |
.61 |
0.58 |
0.14 |
|
Kahekili 7m |
42.4 |
20.22 |
49.38 |
15.3 |
7.46 |
4.58 |
0.75 |
0.34 |
|
Molokini 8m |
58.47 |
1.77 |
27.36 |
0.46 |
12.04 |
0.21 |
2.13 |
1.10 |
|
Molokini 13m |
61.75 |
20.01 |
28.54 |
13.65 |
8.88 |
6.03 |
0.83 |
0.33 |
|
Moloka‘i |
||||||||
|
Kamalō 3m |
67.25 |
5.09 |
14.62 |
3.12 |
13.98 |
1.96 |
4.15 |
0.02 |
|
Kamalō 10m |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
|
Kamiloloa 3m |
11.63 |
6.85 |
54.11 |
12.04 |
33.68 |
5.09 |
0.57 |
0.09 |
|
Kamiloloa 10m |
48.84 |
15.98 |
25.07 |
7.29 |
23.37 |
9.36 |
2.72 |
0.67 |
|
Pala‘au 3m |
96.9 |
0.21 |
1.55 |
0.41 |
0.71 |
0.12 |
1.13 |
0.32 |
|
Pala‘au 10m |
31.69 |
5.91 |
27.95 |
1.64 |
31.9 |
5.85 |
8.46 |
1.71 |
|
Kaho‘olawe |
||||||||
|
Hakioawa 3m |
14.12 |
13.35 |
34.69 |
1.86 |
42.01 |
13.82 |
9.19 |
1.39 |
|
Hakioawa 10m |
18.25 |
2.94 |
27.35 |
2.45 |
40.21 |
10.45 |
14.19 |
5.06 |
|
O‘ahu |
||||||||
|
Hanauma 3m |
20.42 |
4.00 |
68.56 |
2.83 |
10.82 |
1.16 |
0.20 |
0.01 |
|
Hanauma 10m |
98.51 |
0.38 |
0.77 |
0.12 |
0.59 |
0.2 |
0.13 |
0.05 |
|
Pili o Kahe 3m |
33.05 |
16.26 |
66.33 |
16.26 |
0.48 |
0.03 |
0.14 |
0.02 |
|
Kahe Point 3m |
13.89 |
6.91 |
82.66 |
6.60 |
3.33 |
0.30 |
0.12 |
0.02 |
|
Pupukea 4m |
95.81 |
1.55 |
3.80 |
1.19 |
0.29 |
0.29 |
0.11 |
0.05 |
|
Pupukea 8m |
94.35 |
0.02 |
4.44 |
0.65 |
0.88 |
0.46 |
0.34 |
0.17 |
|
Ka‘alaea 2m |
12.89 |
4.37 |
12.43 |
3.35 |
43.95 |
5.48 |
30.73 |
4.46 |
|
Ka‘alaea 8m |
3.83 |
1.85 |
5.13 |
2.33 |
27.98 |
7.14 |
63.06 |
9.02 |
|
He‘eia 2m |
13.41 |
2.67 |
10.66 |
8.44 |
20.39 |
8.13 |
55.54 |
19.24 |
|
He‘eia 8m |
11.26 |
4.38 |
5.14 |
2.74 |
23.7 |
10.16 |
59.9 |
17.28 |
|
Moku o Lo‘e 2m |
22.23 |
1.83 |
11.76 |
2.80 |
24.78 |
0.23 |
41.24 |
1.20 |
|
Moku o Lo‘e 8m |
25.29 |
1.23 |
23.9 |
20.67 |
19.14 |
6.65 |
31.68 |
15.25 |
|
Kaua‘i |
||||||||
|
Limahuli 1m |
46.64 |
10.07 |
46.22 |
10.2 |
6.7 |
0.77 |
0.45 |
0.05 |
|
Limahuli 10m |
11.12 |
4.14 |
74.94 |
2.4 |
13.15 |
1.2 |
0.78 |
0.54 |
|
Miloli‘i 3m |
97.15 |
1.7 |
1.57 |
1.05 |
1.11 |
0.78 |
0.17 |
0.60 |
|
Miloli‘i 10m |
87.64 |
5.18 |
8.79 |
3.40 |
3.08 |
1.62 |
0.49 |
0.17 |
|
Nu‘alolo Kai 3m |
77.63 |
5.64 |
17.96 |
8.62 |
3.42 |
2.08 |
1.00 |
0.90 |
|
Nu‘alolo Kai 10m |
98.51 |
0.38 |
0.77 |
0.12 |
0.59 |
0.20 |
0.13 |
0.05 |
|
Ho‘ai 3m |
34.27 |
0.79 |
60.59 |
0.34 |
4.95 |
0.44 |
0.18 |
0.11 |
|
Ho‘ai 10m |
88.28 |
3.70 |
10.77 |
2.9 |
1.97 |
0.77 |
0.32 |
0.23 |
|
NS=No Sediment |
||||||||
A multivariate analysis groups sites with similar characteristics together in ordination space (Figure 2). Two main clusters are evident in the detrended correspondence analysis below. All six Kāne’ohe Bay samples form a group at the bottom left corner of Figure 2. The cluster at the far right bottom includes some sites with high wave exposure. 57% of the variability can be explained by the size fraction >2.8mm (gravel) on axis 1 while on axis two another 15% of the variance is accounted for by the fine-grain particles (silt and fines). Most of the remaining sites lay along a linear gradient along both horizontal and vertical axes exhibiting from high to low percentages of gravel and silt/fines.

Figure 2 Sediment Grain Size
All Kane’ohe Bay, O’ahu samples are strong outliers for both sediment composition and grain size relative to the remainder of the samples. This region is anomalous to the rest of the state in sediment characteristics, coral cover and fish biomass.
Hakioawa, Kaho’olawe has a high percentage of fine grain particles and organic material reflecting its past history of terrestrial sediment loading which is influence by topography, vegetative cover and soil composition..
Many sites with high wave exposure have high percentages of gravel and corresponding low levels of silt due to flushing and removal by water motion.
The sediments from the relatively recent lava flow at Ka’apuna, Hawai’i contain both low levels of organics and calcium carbonate placing it at the extreme end of the spectrum of sites.
The within site variability is very low in relation to the between site variability. The two depths at each site occupy nearby positions in sample space for the majority of the samples. This site similarity excludes stratification by depth.
Stratification by island is not apparent. No latitudinal gradient exists across any of the sediment variables. The main influences of sediment accumulation are water motion and bathymetry. Sediment in deeper water can be affected by the seaward slope steepness. Sediment removal and/or resuspension are heavily influenced by waves and currents (Te 2001).
A clear gradient along sites is exhibited, ranging from sites with very fine grain particles to sites with large size fractions.
Sediments from the majority of the sites (83%) contain between 2% and 5% organic matter. The only exceptions, Kane’ohe Bay, O’ahu and Ka’apuna, Hawai’i, exhibit extreme deviations from the other sites.
Some sites with north facing exposures have high percentages of large grain sizes and low levels of small grain sizes. This may be attributed to strong currents and high waves.
There are less fine grain particles at shallow sites due to removal by wave action and downslope movement.
References:
Craft et al., 1991
Folk 1974
McManus, 1988,
Parker, 1983,
Te 2001
Click to open a new window and view:
Last Update: 04/21/2008
By: Lea Hollingsworth
Hawai‘i Coral Reef Assessment & Monitoring Program
Hawai‘i Institute of Marine Biology
P.O. Box 1346
Kāne‘ohe, HI 96744
808-236-7440 phone
808-236-7443 fax
email: jokiel@hawaii.edu