CRAMP Home

Long Term Monitoring

Rapid Assessment

Methods

Site Selection
Geographic Coordinates
Biological Parameters
Benthic Protocols

Other Benthic Protocols

Fish Survey Techniques
Rugosity
Sediments
Environmental Parameters
Statistical Methods

Bio-Indicators

Results

Mapping

Watersheds

Publications



Search the CRAMP Website

Navigate the CRAMP Website

Bibliographic Search

CRAMP Rapid Assessment.  Other Benthic Survey Techniques

Numerous methods have been used to evaluate benthic environments. Selection criteria for benthic sampling methods should include the population of interest, statistical power, accuracy, precision, sources of variability, the focus of the study and the spatial scale involved. Time, cost and effort must also be evaluated.

Benthic sampling methods used in coral reef investigations

Method

Type

Description

Limitations

Presence/ Absence

Qualitative

Lists species

No abundance data. Records species only.

Relative abundance

Semi-Qualitative

Categories ranging from common to rare

No absolute data

Quadrat

Quantitative

% cover of substrate types are recorded

High observer variability

Planar Point Intercept

Quantitative

Substrate type under each intersection is recorded

No absolute value can be calculated

Line Transect

Quantitative

Lengths of substrate types underlying the transect line are recorded

Small or rare species can be missed

Nearest Neighbor

Quantitative

Distance of organism from random transect point is recorded

Determines only abundance of target species

Point-Quarter

Quantitative

Coral colony measurements are taken from a haphazardly determined point

Greater variance. Vertical overlap possible

Photographic Transect

Quantitative

Video or digital still images

Resolution

CRAMP has compared nine methods widely used in Hawai‘i. Data on coral coverage has been taken by different methods and by different individuals over a period of many years. The methods involved vary due to the needs of specific investigations. Constraints on time, differences in questions being asked (intensive or extensive), and utility of sampling regimes under various field conditions led to employment of different methods that undoubtedly will continue to be used in the future. These methods vary in the amount of time required in the field and time required to process the field data. There is a high cost for the specialized hardware and software needed to process the information for some of the techniques. Thus a comparison of these methods was undertaken in order to determine whether or not results of different techniques could be combined in an analysis of coral cover in Hawai‘i.

Jokiel PL, Rodgers KS, Brown EK, Kenyon JC, Aeby G, Smith WR, Farrell F (2005). Comparison of Methods Used to Estimate Coral Cover in the Hawaiian Islands. Final Report Submitted to: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, Northwestern Hawaiian Islands Coral Reef Ecosystem Reserve. Research Conducted Under: United States Department of the Interior, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, Memorandum of Agreement 2005-008/6882 Amendment No. 001. December 2, 2005. 22 pp.

 

Last Update: 04/21/2008

By: Lea Hollingsworth

Hawai‘i  Coral Reef Assessment & Monitoring Program

Hawai‘i  Institute of Marine Biology

P.O. Box 1346

Kāne‘ohe, HI 96744

808-236-7440 phone

808-236-7443 fax

email: jokiel@hawaii.edu